Leanabl Logo

Technical File Gap Analysis

Know what your technical file is missing before submission.

A weak technical file turns review into remediation.

Documentation Readiness

Documentation Readiness

How cleanly your existing DHF, technical file, test evidence, and claims map to the target submission structure.

Test Report Validation

Test Report Validation

Whether safety, EMC, biocompatibility, software, cybersecurity, and usability evidence is current, complete, and usable.

Clinical & Performance Scrutiny

Clinical & Performance Scrutiny

Whether clinical, bench, and performance data can support the intended use, indications, and market-facing claims.

Service specification

A productized gap-analysis spec, not an open-ended document review.

Korea Technical File Gap Analysis

You know what will be reviewed, what is excluded, what you receive, what your team must provide, and how remediation is scoped after the analysis.

Request assessment

For Korea, the review maps your existing file to Korea-specific technical documentation, MFDS or designated review expectations, KGMP submission-file dependencies, cybersecurity and usability expectations, and Korean-language filing needs.

Document structure, evidence completeness, report validity, claims support; Full document rewrite, testing execution, authority filing

Gap matrix with severity, rationale, owner, and recommended action; Working session to confirm remediation priorities

Typically 2–4 weeks after complete document intake; Kickoff, intake check, technical review, gap report, review meeting

DHF or technical file, IFU, claims, test reports, clinical summaries; SME access for file context and remediation decisions

Fixed-fee when file scope is clear; Remediation and submission work scoped separately

FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)

Common questions about Technical File Gap Analysis