Leanabl Logo

Korea · Cybersecurity & SBOM

Defensible Medical Device Cybersecurity Submission Packaging

Leveraging our proprietary MFDS review database to cut turnaround to 1/5 and systematically prevent recurring deficiency cycles, we prepare complete compliance packages for connected devices (Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, USB, Cloud): STRIDE threat modeling, machine-readable SBOMs (SPDX/CycloneDX), and post-market vulnerability response plans.

Domain Expertise

Deep regulatory authority across every medical device domain

SaMD · AI Digital Health

IEC 62304 · Software Lifecycle · MFDS AI/Big Data & DTx Guidance

Submitted complete BLE threat models and standard SBOMs to secure first-round MFDS cybersecurity approval.

Active Devices · Robotics

IEC 60601-1 / 60601-1-2 (Ed. 4.1) · IEC 60601-2-XX Particular Standards

Essential Performance definition and worst-case test matrix optimization across accredited laboratories

Implants · Biomaterials

ISO 10993-1 to 23 Biocompatibility · ISO 11135 / 11137 Sterilization Validation

Biological endpoint matrix design and ISO 10993-18 chemical characterization / toxicological assessment

In Vitro Diagnostics (IVD)

Korea IVD Act & EU IVDR (2017/746) · CLSI EP Guidelines (EP05, EP06, EP12, EP17)

CLSI-compliant Limit of Detection (LoD), cross-reactivity, interference, and lot-to-lot reproducibility protocols

Proprietary Data & Precedent Validation

Empirical SBOM Vulnerability (CVE/NVD) & STRIDE Threat Matrix Validation

100% Traceability Across SBOM Components, CVE Remediations & Security Tests

Engineered 4-Stage Workflow

A 4-Stage Pipeline from Threat Modeling to Submission-Ready Security Dossier

Step 01 / 04Stage Gate & Output

Locked System Architecture, DFD & Baseline SBOM

Incomplete baseline data or misclassified regulatory pathways are the primary drivers of multi-month submission delays. Gate 01 locks the device scope, predicate/standard mapping, and full document inventory before authoring begins.

Verification Baseline

Device description, intended use, existing test reports, and QMS document index

Gate Sign-Off Output

Confirmed classification matrix and locked submission master inventory

Agentic Automation & Platform Integration

Continuous Post-Market SBOM Monitoring & Security Patch Governance

Live SBOM-to-Security-Risk Traceability

Connect software BOM components in PLM directly to security risk controls and verification evidence.

@Risk Management— Run "Live SBOM-to-Security-Risk Traceability" across our Cybersecurity & SBOM records and call out the highest-priority compliance findings first.

I'll inspect the linked quality and dossier records against target regulatory standards, then report actionable findings with verified outputs.

Thought for 4.2s · Explored Risk Management records & 14 regulatory clauses

P1 · Verified Agent Output· Locked System Architecture, DFD & Baseline SBOM

Connect software BOM components in PLM directly to security risk controls and verification evidence. ISO 14971 risk register linked to design control

Automated Post-Market CVE Triage & Patch Change Control

Route newly disclosed vulnerabilities into structured impact assessments and regulatory change evaluations.

@Bill of Materials— Run "Automated Post-Market CVE Triage & Patch Change Control" across our Cybersecurity & SBOM records and call out the highest-priority compliance findings first.

I'll inspect the linked quality and dossier records against target regulatory standards, then report actionable findings with verified outputs.

Thought for 4.3s · Explored Bill of Materials records & 14 regulatory clauses

P1 · Verified Agent Output· Multi-Market Cybersecurity Dossier Synchronization

Keep MFDS security checklists, FDA TPLC plans, and customer MDS2 forms synchronized from a single source of truth. Multi-level BOM with revisions and comparison

Service Specification

Service Scope & Final Deliverables

Scope

We evaluate your security file the way a reviewer will, reporting exactly where documentation falls short of expectations.

  • Threat model and security risk assessment documentation
  • SBOM completeness, machine-readable formats, and transitive dependency coverage
  • Security architecture, boundary definitions, and data-flow diagrams
  • Vulnerability handling procedures and Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure (CVD)
  • Labeling instructions, patch controls, and post-market cybersecurity surveillance

Deliverables

Reviewer-ready audit findings accompanied by precise engineering remediation tasks.

  • Clause-by-clause Cybersecurity Gap Matrix (findings, severity, regulation, owner)
  • Regulatory Evidence Traceability Index
  • SBOM Format Compliance & Known Vulnerability Assessment
  • Remediation Sequencing Plan for Development & Regulatory Teams
Cybersecurity & SBOM — Service Scope & Final Deliverables
CategoryItem / MilestoneSpecification & Deliverable
ScopeScope 1Threat model and security risk assessment documentation
ScopeScope 2SBOM completeness, machine-readable formats, and transitive dependency coverage
ScopeScope 3Security architecture, boundary definitions, and data-flow diagrams
ScopeScope 4Vulnerability handling procedures and Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure (CVD)
ScopeScope 5Labeling instructions, patch controls, and post-market cybersecurity surveillance
WorkflowStage 1: Documentation Intake & Completeness CheckSystematic ingestion of architecture diagrams, SBOM exports, risk files, and test records.
WorkflowStage 2: Authority Guidance Cross-MappingRigorous mapping against FDA §524B, EU MDCG 2019-16, and MFDS medical device cybersecurity guidelines.
WorkflowStage 3: Threat Model & Component Deep-DiveDetailed verification of threat vector coverage, known CVE mitigations, and crypto controls.
WorkflowStage 4: Gap Matrix Delivery & Alignment SessionDelivery of prioritized findings and an executive walkthrough aligning software, regulatory, and quality leads.
DeliverablesDeliverable 1Clause-by-clause Cybersecurity Gap Matrix (findings, severity, regulation, owner)
DeliverablesDeliverable 2Regulatory Evidence Traceability Index
DeliverablesDeliverable 3SBOM Format Compliance & Known Vulnerability Assessment
DeliverablesDeliverable 4Remediation Sequencing Plan for Development & Regulatory Teams

Frequently Asked Questions

While threat models and SBOMs align, MFDS mandates Korean translation summaries, compliance with Korean privacy laws, and domestic wireless alignments.

Upon receiving any deficiency notice from MFDS or a review body, our specialists dissect the reviewer’s statutory intent against historical clearance precedents. We separate items resolvable via technical justification from those requiring supplementary bench data, draft the complete formal response package, and manage reviewer alignment through final closure.

Yes. However, direct translation without regulatory reconciliation frequently triggers rejections due to standard edition mismatches or Korea National Deviations. We map your existing IECEE CB / ILAC test reports and global dossiers 1:1 against MFDS recognized standards to maximize evidence reuse and avoid redundant laboratory testing.

Our workflow is engineered to minimize engineering disruption. Once your team provides baseline source files (specifications, BOM, existing reports) during Stage 1 intake, Leanabl handles the heavy lifting: statutory mapping, Korean regulatory authoring, traceability matrix compilation, electronic portal filing, and agency correspondence. Your team only reviews and signs off at structured stage gates.

We immediately perform a regulatory change impact assessment to determine whether the modification requires a formal Technical File amendment, minor notification, or internal QMS documentation update. Because all deliverables are structured into modular digital assets, subsequent design iterations only require updating the affected sections rather than rebuilding the dossier from scratch.

Ready to Eliminate Cybersecurity Deficiency Risks for Your Connected Device?

Backed by our proprietary MFDS review database, we assemble defensible STRIDE threat models and standard SBOM packages in record time.